Melb Mag 10/10/12

Court proceedings and Legal Process
Slattery
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:24 pm

Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby Slattery » Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:00 pm

My spies spotted you at Melbourne Magistrates Court yesterday Mr. HARDY. Was it a successful day for you?
:wink:

LEO
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:33 pm

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby LEO » Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:57 pm

Isn't it always a successful day for him, as he gets paid either way win or lose :lol:

Then again so do I :wink:

Hardy
Site Admin
Posts: 8461
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 10:00 am
Location: Melbourne Victoria
Contact:

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby Hardy » Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:32 am

It was a successful day for my client. Won all seven charges, saved him from at least 6 months of licence loss and bucket loads of fines.

Boki
Posts: 918
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby Boki » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:02 pm

What were the charges?

Hardy
Site Admin
Posts: 8461
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 10:00 am
Location: Melbourne Victoria
Contact:

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby Hardy » Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:19 pm

2 x s.64(1) manner dangerous and speed dangerous
s.65A loss of traction
rr 297(1) fail to have proper control
rr20 110kmh/60
r.50 - number plate not displayed
r.46 not indicating

Sorry, looks like I saved him from minimum 12 months, not 6!
Hey - at least he was sober and had a licence!

Slattery
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby Slattery » Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:22 pm

Geez, youd think the informant would know how to issue a summons properly hey Sean?
:)

oscar
Posts: 706
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:00 am

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby oscar » Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:42 pm

then they need a slap around the head, as does their sgt (if it's one of those errors)

Slattery
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby Slattery » Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:06 pm

It'll either be that or an ID issue!

oscar
Posts: 706
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:00 am

Re: Melb Mag 10/10/12

Postby oscar » Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:42 pm

ID - sgt should make sure that point of proof is covered

even an a/sgt !!!! :)


Return to “Courts and Lawyers”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest